Wednesday, March 20, 2019
Comparing Changes in The Metamorphosis and A Dollââ¬â¢s House :: comparison compare contrast essays
  The Times are a Changing in The Metamorphosis and A Dolls  theatre   Circumstance is a powerful thing it causes evolution in characters  distant  beyond what they would normally experience. In Franz Kafkas The Metamorphosis  Kafka develops the attitude towards this situation   by dint of with(predicate) the use of his  protagonist Gregor. In the character Gregor we see that an individual  get out cling  to their ideals and fail to  vary to circumstance. Inversely we see Henrik Ibsen  in A Dolls House that Nora, normally shy, possessing many doll-like qualities  can adapt to her situation and ultmately come out on top.   Gregor, in The Metamorphosis goes through a transformation. He has changed  into a giant insect, thus beginning a new physical life. But Gregor clings to  his ideals, his strongly held beliefs of family that root themselves from his  own insecurity. This causes Gregor  a good deal greif as the physical body starts to  wear its impression onto his mind. Although it d   idnt take  vast for Gregor to  adapt in the physical sense, he never really  get hitched with the true reality of the  situation. He held onto his illusion of humanity because he clung to his  idealism. This  omit of mental adaptation caused Gregors ultimate downfall, but  as he adage it, it was a noble sacrifice. So for Gregor not to adapt to this  situation with a fundamental change in ideology, was a fatal flaw in Gregors  personality. Sure enough, we are all Gregors in a sense, we all  imagine in  something, be it a religion, or the perpetual love of our parents. In this short  story Kafka mirrors the effect of faith and morals into Gregor, suggesting that  the static  temperament of these ideals will, in the right context lead to a persons  ultimate demise.  Nora, the doll-like  grow from Henrik Ibsens A Dolls House shows the human  capacity for adaptation, and the effect these changes have on various aspects of  an individual. In the beginning of the play, Nora was a very doll   -like  character, more  ductile than human. Nora showed very little sign of having an  original thought of her own, and dumbly fondled her  trend along life to the  condescending comments of her arrogant husband, Helmer. When confronted with the  possibility of Helmers death  receivable to his own stubborn nature, she had taken a  leap of faith into a loan of money, one that she would seemingly never pay back.  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.